|
The effective way of defeating Pre-cultural theology-inspired
Islamic terrorism The title of this story sounds like a
contrived cliché. But in it hides the nature of the adversary we face
today. Use of imagery would make it clearer. What if we were facing a
bunch of venomous scorpions instead of Pre-cultural theology-inspired
terrorists as adversaries? Would we have waited for being stung by
one of them to launch a attack on them? And after having been stung,
would we have limited our action to attacking only those of the
scorpions who had stung us?
If you are familiar with U.S. history, consider the way we completely
drove out the last Briton (colonialist) from the newly independent
United States in 1776, consider the sacking of Atlanta during our
Civil War, and the psychological impact on Southerners of Sherman's
March to the Sea. Unfortunately, these are the necessary atrocities
of a successful military campaign. This is what the history of war
teaches: Without a complete and total annihilation of the enemy, he
will never come to realize the folly of his ways... and he will rise
to fight us again. The point is when and under what circumstances
will we be provoked to carry this war to a decisively successful
conclusion. Last time it was Pearl Harbor, this time if it has not
been 9/11, then will it be a nuke or dirty nuke attack on the West or
the US mainland? Or can better sense prevail in our Administration
before that happens? Penning this article is one attempt towards that
objective.
Photo credits:
ntv.ru _____________________
How appealing would we have found the justification for such
selective counter-attacks on the specious argument that attacking
those of the scorpions who had not yet attacked us would enrage them
to attack us? And again such attack on innocent scorpions (sic) would
also create a rage on the scorpion street against us and lead more an
more of the scorpions to enter the sleeping cells and join in more
attacks on us. Or to make it closer to home, when the Red Rags gang
strikes strollers in the park on 45th Avenue, do we use the National
Guards to strike only at the members of this Red Rags gang or move
against all gangs to remove the scourge of gangsterism from our
streets once and forever? The answer to both these allegories is
obvious. Then why do we need to be so selective and subject ourselves
to fallacious and phony filibustering of stopping and reversing the
War on Terror and to limit any action, if at all to those who have
attacked us.? Don't all those who come from the ethos of a Pre-
cultural theology-inspired terrorism, believe it to be their holy
duty to attack all those who are outside their culture, as do
scorpions sting anyone who falls in their path? To sting is an
instinctive response of a scorpion, quite like an attack (Ghazawat or
Razzia) is for those who come from the ethos of Pre-cultural theology-
inspired terrorism. Being humans and not scorpions their urge to
attack is not dependent on another culture cross their path, but they
actively seek out all other cultures to victimize. Scorpions do not
actively seek out anyone. So the attack from Pre-cultural theology-
inspired terrorists is conditioned on their state of mind which
drills into them an imagined superiority of their culture over all
others. A psychology that scorpions do not have. So this makes the
Pre-cultural theology-inspired terrorists more dangerous, as you can
stay safe if you do not cross the path of scorpions or confine them
to a location where you can stay out of harm's way. The same cannot
be done with Pre-cultural theology-inspired terrorists. A scorpion
is inflamed by the sight or touch of another being and it stings as
an instinctive response, but the Pre-cultural theology-inspired
terrorists are inflamed when they see liberated women, who dress as
they wish live as they wish, and this is enough reason for the Pre-
cultural theology-inspired terrorists to launch an attack on us.
There has been a case of a arrested Pre-cultural theology-inspired
terrorist who had been convicted for rape because of which he wanted
to be a suicide (Genocide) bomber. When apprehended before he could
blow himself up he confessed that he found Western culture morally
decadent as the jury could accept the word of the woman whose modesty
he had violated against his word. He found this a sign of Western
decadence. Not his own act of rape, but the fact that the word of a
lady victim could weigh more than his own in a court of law! This
is one fountainhead of infuriation which Pre-cultural theology-
inspired terrorists have against Western culture. But then they also
have a "positive" reason for attacking us! They are told that by
avenging the humiliation which the West subjects them to by allowing
women a liberated existence, they can land up in heaven, where they
would enjoy conjugal relations with nymphs (houris), and so some of
the suicide bombers in Israel have been found to have enveloped their
penises in aluminum foil, to prevent it from burning to be used when
fornicating with the houris in heaven! Can any one in his or her
right mind ever try to reason with such depraved specimens of
humanity? Scorpions could be easy to deal with, by locking them up or
simply swatting them. Do we see any solution for dealing with humans
whose instincts are scorpion-like, but whose reason for stinging us
are because we exist and live life the way we want to, and their
reward for doing so is other worldly? It is high time we did see a
parallel between the scorpions and Pre-cultural theology-inspired
terrorists and also in extending the way we respond to scorpions to
the Pre-cultural theology-inspired terrorists. Only in doing this
lies our salvation. We need to brush aside those who want to lead
us up the garden path by saying that if we attack the Pre-cultural
theology-inspired terrorists, it would motivate more of them to
attack us an awaken those of whom are dormant. All of those who come
from the ethos of Pre-cultural theology-inspired terrorism are bound
to attack us sometime or the other. The motivation, the
justification, the readiness is already in place; what they await is
opportunity. And they have the opportunity, they strike. They can lie
in wait for years, but never give up their objective - to strike all
those who do not follow their depraved outlook. This makes them more
dangerous than venomous scorpions. The Pre-cultural theology-
inspired terrorists are those venomous scorpions who actively seek
out victims whom they can sting, unlike the real scorpions who sting
only if you get into their path. The Pre-cultural theology-inspired
terrorists do not wait for you to get into their path, they get into
yours. And if you avoid them, they provoke you with a deliberate raid
(Ghazawat) as they did on 9/11, 3/11, 7/7, and have done so all
through the 1400 years of their history. The victims have varied from
Byzantines to Persians, to Chinese, to Mongols, to Spaniards, to
Hindus, to Serbs, to Austrians, but their strategy remained intact to
attack and if it was not possible to attack directly then to provoke
the enemy with a raid (Ghazawat or Razzia) as they have done it New
Yrok, Madrid, London, Bali, Beslan and many other places across the
globe. It is up to us to realize the nature of our enemy and
respond in kind against an adversary all members of whom draw their
motivation for a single source, the Quran, which motivates them to
murder all non-Muslims. Atta, Zarqawi, Osama, and Zawahiri or
Sistani, Musharraf Mahmoud Abbas, and Mubarak all share the source of
their motivation. So how can they be different.
With the Quran setting the principles for forcible conversion of all
non-Muslims to Islam and using coercion of treating non-Muslims like
2nd class beings, the base is prepared for the Madaressahs (Islamic
theological-terrorism schools) to inculcate these Quranic principles
into the minds of every growing generation of Muslims to have this
attitude of paranoid coercion. Further at every prayer
(Ibadat/Namaz), the Muslim priest (Maulavi) preaches the practice of
terror to his audience. This is how a terrorist is born. So the
Quran, and what is preached in the Madaressahs and the Mosques are
the real origin of terrorism. And until the world over, we do not
eradicate these, the problem of terrorism will not end. All the
billion and half of those who take their inspiration from the Quran
have the same murderous instinct. The difference is that in some the
opportunity does not present itself to execute their instinct. The
instinct does not differ. And in some discretion is the better part
of valor, but there to the instinct is same. As the case is so
hopeless, the only hope of breaking this circle of hate is by
delivering a message in kind to all the billion and a half Muslims
that would disabuse them of any hope for victory over us with their
method of murder and mayhem. We need to be prepared for this as soon
there will come a point when widespread Muslim terror attacks against
the U.S. will no longer allow military actions as we have taken in
Iraq and Afghanistan and will call for a re-appraisal of our military
strategy. A re-appraisal as happened during World War 2 when the
allies in 1939 began by bombarding Germany with pamphlets asking the
Germans to make peace, to the bombing of Dresden to rubble in 1945.
It took six years during the last World War to bring about this
change. How long will it take now? And in what circumstances now do
we reach that point? Here's the dilemma: to have any hope of victory
over the Jihadis, we must use a terrible, overwhelming, and insidious
force; yet, in using that force we risk losing popular support for
the war effort. Victory requires a devastation so complete as to
disabuse the enemy of any and all notions of pride (in this case Arab
and Muslim pride) and the futility of resisting us. This kind of
psychological change is forced in the enemy only by visiting a defeat
on him that is so horrendous and complete that his very existence is
dependent upon your will. Think of the bombing of Tokyo, and the fire-
storms that followed in 1945. Think of Dresden. It is said that bombs
fell in Dresden until the only effect was to bounce the rubble. Think
of Hiroshima (horrendous as it seems, but can we prevent it from
coming to that sometime in this war?). If you are familiar with
U.S. history, consider the way we completely drove out the last
Briton (colonialist) from the newly independent United States in
1776, consider the sacking of Atlanta during our Civil War, and the
psychological impact on Southerners of Sherman's March to the Sea.
Unfortunately, these are the necessary atrocities of a successful
military campaign. This is what the history of war teaches: Without a
complete and total annihilation of the enemy, he will never come to
realize the folly of his ways... and he will rise to fight us again.
The point is when and under what circumstances will we be provoked to
carry this war to a decisively successful conclusion. Last time it
was Pearl Harbor, this time if it has not been 9/11, then will it be
a nuke or dirty nuke attack on the West or the US mainland? Or can
better sense prevail in our Administration before that happens?
Penning this article is one attempt towards that
objective. Story Credits: WaronJihad Team
__________________________________________________
Discuss this
article
|