|
Are Muslims Alienated all over the World, as a civilized
lifestyle is alien for them? We keep hearing that we need to
integrate Muslim into our mainstream societies. Interestingly we hear
this in all non-Muslim countries where Muslim have settled. Is it
that there is a 'Conspiracy' against the Muslims in which everyone
else has collaborated - the Chinese with the Americans, with the
Italians, with the Kenyans, with the Russians, with the Spanish?
Why do we not hear voices asking for Christians, Buddhists,
Hindus or Jews to integrate? Have we ever thought of this? Why
is it that only Muslims face the problem of integration with the
rest. They cannot integrate in Britain, in the Us, in Israel, in
Bosnia, in Chechnya, in Kashmir, in Mindanao, in Malaku, in
Ethiopia, in Australia and wherever else they have gone and parked
themselves.
Why does the presence of a Muslim community across the globe spell
doomsday for a peaceful and civilized life? Are Muslims
alienated because of the Islamic outlook of Universal hatred due to
which they are alien to any civilized way of life? The Quran asks
them not to take Jews and Christians and idolators as friends. Not to
love ones father, if he is not a Muslim! With this jaundiced view
that Muslims have of the entire non-Muslim the question to be asked
is Can Muslims integrate with any non-Muslim society? and
Is it worthwhile and sensible to integrate a community that has an
explicit aim of uprooting all other communities? or is it
sensible to uproot the Muslims from our midst to ensure the rest a
sensible and civilized existence?
Photo credits:
judeotheque _____________________
Muslims refuse to integrate with any other society due to their
upbringing, their ethos because of which they have their egoistic,
self-centered outlook of universal hatred. The Islamic outlook of
Universal hatred is evident from the following traits:
1) Their role-models are cruel war-mongers who keep having bloody
fights with each other This is based on the observed fact today
that a majority of the Muslims (who take to the streets) across many
countries, lionize and idolize extremists and
war-mongers like Bin Laden but not progressive and
constructive reformers like Ataturk, or former King Amanullah of
Afghanistan.
2)They prefer living in theocratic dictatorship and feel footloose in
the democratic West. There is no democracy, no elections and
no public accountability for any act in any Islamic society. This has
to be imposed from outside by American marines as in the case of Iraq
and Afghanistan or through diplomatic pressure as in the case of
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. This is so since today most of
the Muslim majority countries cannot sustain
democracies. Except Turkey, no Muslim majority
country has a sustained democratic tradition. Even Malaysia and
Indonesia where elections take place have had intermittent military
dictatorships. And most
Muslim populations look up up with respect on Islamic dictatorships or
monarchies not on democracies which appear weak to the dictatorial
Islamic mindset.
The list of Islamic theocratic dictatorships would include Saudi
Arabia, Morocco,
Jordan (despotic monarchies), Syria, Iraq, Chad,
(dictatorships) Iran (nominal democracy under strain from
clerics), Kuwait (nominal democracy under emirate), UAE,
North Yemen (and occupied South Yemen which had a sort of
democratic set up earlier), Libya, Sudan, Tunisia, Algeria
(Military rule of secularized military), Malaysia (civilian
dictatorship of Mahathir Mohammed), Indonesia (fledgling
democracy), Pakistan, Bangladesh (spells of democratic rule
broken by military dictatorships), Central African Republic
(kingdom of former "Emperor"; Bokassa), Uganda (a Christian
majority country that had a taste of Islamic dictatorship
under Idi Amin), Afghanistan (theocratic dictatorship of the
Taliban before American Marines brought democracy), etc.
3) Muslims in the West cannot bear the idea of their women being
free. They want to perpetrate ill-treatment of women. Even in the
West their Women are discouraged from pursuing any professional
career. Men too are be forced to wear turbans and grow beards through
sermons in Mosques in London, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Burnley,
Paris, Berlin, Lyons. Even in the West they want their women to not
have equal
rights in education, free-movement, driving,
apparel, and even participation in mass-prayers in the
mosques alongside their men-folk, (no doubt the scripture
will be quoted to explain this, but this is the reality).
The hijab, Chador or burqua (veil and full length gown) for women is
still a
common feature in Islamic societies. In the ideal Islamic society
of the former Talibanized Afghnaistan adult men are forced to grow a
beard and wear the prescribed Islamic dress, they cannot sport normal
(Western) hairstyles and even students above the age of three are
forced to wear turbans. This is what they want to perpetuate in the
West under the grab of protecting their cultural identity.
4) They continue to send their kids to get the highly jaundiced and
narrow scrap of education in religious schools that teaches only the
Quran. This is based on the observation today that a
significant number of the devout Muslims in the West world prefer
talim (religious education) in Madarrasah (Muslim
theological schools) as against professional education. They send
their kids to the Madarrasah at least as supplementary education
after regular school.
5) Even in the West, Muslims do not have respect for human rights
and no freedom of thought and expression. Anyone speaking out
against Islam or the Quran or the Prophet is targeted with a fatwa of
death like Salman Rushdie and Theo Van Gough. They want the Shariah
as the law of the land in UK and US so that they could have savage
punishments like flogging and stoning to death, cutting off of the
limbs for common crimes like pilfering and stealing. Even in the
West many leading and vocal Muslim organizations practice the
politics of fatwah
(Muslim religious decree) of death towards those who express
themselves against Islam. A Muslim who publicly declares
that he is no longer a Muslim is considered a Murtad and he
is punishable by death (although there are various
interpretations of the Koran on this)
6) Even if you were a Muslim and belonged to a minority sect like the
Shias or Ahmediyas, you would be considered to be an infidel or
heretic and be subject to harassment. This is based on the
observation that even in a city like London today where a majority of
the Sunnis (a majority sect among the Muslims) look upon the Shias as
heretics.
So also are the other smaller Islamic sects.
7) Even within Muslim societies in the UK, Netherlands, France
there is no scope for having any opinion, idea, innovation outside
the Quran-al-sharif or anything that is considered non-
islamic. This in fact freeze all progress and dissent. Even
in London, Paris, Lyons, Frankfurt most second generation Muslim
immigrants look upon anything non-islamic as Kufr and
Jahiliyat (infidel, ignorance) and also the entire non-islamic
world as
Dar-ul-Harb (literally 'Hostile zone') or the Infidel world.
And anything that even a Muslim chooses to do, which is frowned upon
by the clergy,
is considered as Haram (illegitimate).
8) Even within Muslim localities in London, Rotterdam, Lyons,
aggressive, quarrelsome attitudes are a common feature of human
behavior and social relations are perpetually violent whether at
the family level, local area level, province level, national level or
global level. The crime rate is high within Muslim localities.
This is based on the observation today where most of the criminals
(in non-Muslim countries) are Muslims. Muslims are also dominant in
global terrorism. Even at the national level they (Iran, Sudan,
Pakistan, etc) specialize in the making of chemical weapons of mass
destruction. Soon the nuclear capability that is today limited to
Pakistan will proliferate to Iran, the Arab world and rest of the
Muslim world and we shall soon see a mushrooming of small rogue
states armed with nuclear capable missiles that would bedevil the
rest of the non-Islamic world. Even as organisations Islamic gangs
would terrorize the world. Examples of such gangs are the Al Qaida,
Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Muslim Brotherhood , Lashkar-e-
Tayyaba, Harkat-ul-Mujahedeen, Hizb-ul-Mujahedeen, Jaish-e-Mohammedi,
Abu Sayyaf, etc
Thus the presence of a Muslim community across the globe spells
doomsday for a peaceful and civilized life, It is for these
reasons among others, why the rest of the world (including some de-
islamized Muslims who have given up the Islamic outlook) look askance
at the growing clout of the Muslim clergy over the Ummah i.e. the
general Muslim populace in the West. And the resultant growing
disturbances that Muslims cause in areas where they live alongside
non-Muslims - like London, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Burnley,
Lyons, Palermo, Kosovo, Macedonia, apart from Egypt (Coptic
Christians), Southern Sudan, Ethiopia/Eritrea, Southern Philippines
(Mindanao), Indonesia (Malaku), Kashmir (India), Israel, etc. With
this track record is it any surprise that you find Muslims refusing
to integrate into any non-Muslim society anywhere across the globe.
We are tempted to ask the following question. Are Muslims
alienated because of the Islamic outlook of Universal hatred due to
which they are alien to a civilized way of life? The Quran asks
them not to take Jews and Christians and idolators as friends. Not to
love ones father, if he is not a Muslim! With this jaundiced view
that Muslims have of the entire non-Muslim the question to be asked
is Can Muslims integrate with any non-Muslim society? and
Is it worthwhile and sensible to integrate a community that has an
explicit aim of uprooting all other communities? or is it
sensible to uproot the Muslims from our midst to ensure the rest a
sensible and civilized existence?
Story Credits : War on Jihad
__________________________________________________
Discuss this
article
|
