|
Understanding the enemy to enable us to...
..destroy it Once and Forever
We draw the following tenets from Islam with the specific aim of
outdoing the enemy in all aspects of the game of war on terror so that
we could destroy Islam - once and forever.

An important part of the War on Terror should be to not limit the victory
over the Muslims by allowing them to retain their murderous creed of
Islam. If we make this mistake, then the Muslims would someday re-attack us
with redoubled vigor fuelled by their revengeful mentality. This
happened when the Mongols under Hulagu Khan had defeated the
Muslims in 1258, but did not compel them to leave Islam. The
result, the Muslims regrouped and when they got the upper hand compelled
the defeated Mongols accept Islam thus negating all the advantages
that the Mongols had by first defeating the Muslims.
This tenet is derived from the Muslim mentality. Whenever the
Muslims defeat any non-Muslims, they do not extend niceties to the
defeated party. The Muslims give their victims three choices : - Embrace
Islam, - Live a life of constant humiliation and hardship under Muslim
tyranny as 2nd class denizens worse than animals, - Be hacked to death
for refusing to embrace Islam and refusing to accept the 2nd class status where you are treated worse than animals. The
same courtesy needs to be extended to all defeated Muslims, if we are to
consolidate the gains of our victory over the enemy.
Photo credits:
americanintelligence _____________________
Existence of the enemy is enough cause for his
destruction This first tenet draws from the Islamic outlook for whom the
existence of Kafirs (non-Muslims) is enough cause for making war
(Jihad) on them. The reason for this war waged by Muslims is to call
them to (accept) Islam. The Quran tells the Muslims to convert entire humankind
to Islam. Osama clarifies this thought when he says "Allazu Lilah,
Walhukmu Lilah" (The entire world belongs to allah and so the rule of
allah should prevail all over the world.) With this imperialist
ideology that is implemented with fascist means of terror, the only
hope for the rest of humankind is to look upon the existence of Muslims
as a sufficient cause for making war against them. Much in the same way
our ancestors hunted down the Saber toothed tigers to make our
existence safe, or the way we still do pest control to make our houses
safe from rodents, and termites. In doing pest control we do not search
for any root causes which the rodents and termites have to harm our
houses, neither do we spare any rodent or termite. We eliminate all of
them. The same psychology needs to be at work in our minds when we
battle Islam, as the threat from Islam is exactly like that posed by
termites rodents and other vermin whose existence means harm to our way of life.
War against the enemy need not wait for any cause. If necessary
use of any trumped up cause is good enough to start a war against
Muslims After having identified the existential nature of threat
that Islam poses, it would be foolish on our part to wait for Muslims
to attack us. Anyway they have already attacked us on 9/11, 7/7, 3/11
and before that all through the 1400 years that they have been in existence. So
causes for war against them are abundant. We only need to be sagacious
and courageous enough to state that openly for the benefit of the
doubting Thomases amongst us to make it evident why we are waging a
war of annihilation against Islam. This tenet also is pulled out from
Islam. They follow a technique called Da'wa or invitation (to embrace
Islam). This is the deceptive reason they give is to save our souls
from burning in hellfire in the hereinafter (the other world). They
tell us to "embrace Islam and be safe". Be safe from what? - From
hellfire? Oh no, they ask us to be safe from being attacked by Muslims who would
then force Islam down our throats at the pain of death or an
existence worse than animals under Muslim tyranny of subjugation as 2nd class
citizen; or being hacked to
death if we refuse to embrace Islam or life a life of subjugation under Muslim tyranny. This way the
Muslims have waged war on all those who lay in their path starting from
the Arabs, Byzantine Christians,
Egyptian Coptic
Christians, Persians, Spaniards Austrians and other
Europeans and many others. In this way the Muslims have used their
trumped up cause of asking non-Muslim to embrace Islam; and making war
upon them for refusal to embrace Islam. So we are fully within our rights to wage an
undeclared war on Muslims, or give any trumped up reason to start
that war. An unabashed declaration that we want to destroy Islam would
be the best option, if we can put the entities or rather
non-entities like the UN into oblivion.
Deception, subterfuge, trickery are legitimate weapons in this war The most
important tenet we pick from Islam is Taqqiya (or Taqiya) which means
deception. Always keep the Muslims guessing, make treaties with
them which we never intend to abide by, give them false promises, never trust a word they say, and attack
them when they least expect and in a manner they never would dream
about. Only this way can we defeat and destroy this sly and beastly
enemy. The track
record of Muslim treachery is well documented, we need to learn
from that. The treaty of Hudaibiya is one
fine example of Muslim treachery.
When facing the Muslims, if you are weak then it is fine to compromise with the enemy, but only to
regroup and attack him later when you are again strong
enough Another main tenet from the Muslim track record which is
enshrined in the Quran is to compromise with the enemy if we are weak, but
only to regroup and attack him later when you are again strong enough.
To let go off any opportunity to attacking and destroying Muslims
when you are strong, is foolish and suicidal. Whenever the non-Muslims have allowed
this to happen and let the Muslims escape and re-group, the Muslims
have attacked with redoubled vigor and violence and have destroyed the
non-Muslims utterly and forced them to accept Islam. This happened in Christian Syria after the battle of Muta (in Syria),
Persia after the
battle of Al Jisr (in Iraq) (the Bridge). After both these battles the Muslims were allowed by the Byzantines and Persians to escape and regroup only to be attacked and defeated by them and being forced to become Muslims. This is why Syria and Iraq are Muslim today.
The aim of the war with Islam is to give the option to the enemy
give up their beastly outlook completely and join us in fighting Islam it to its
destruction. An important part of this war is not to limit the victory
over the Muslims to allow them to retain their murderous creed of
Islam. If this is done, then the Muslims would someday re-attack us
with redoubled vigor fuelled by their revengeful mentality. This
happened when the Mongols under Hulagu Khan had defeated the
Muslims in 1258, but did not compel them to leave Islam. The
result, the Muslims regrouped and when they got the upper hand compelled
the defeated Mongols accept Islam thus negating all the advantages
that the Mongols had by first defeating the Muslims.
The end of this war can only be with the complete and permanent
destruction of our beastlike enemy When we fumigate our
houses, we do not leave any rodent, termite, or vermin behind? No, we get rid of all of them.
The plain reason: we do not want our houses and furniture to be attacked again. The same logic
applies to the other vermin in human form - the Muslims. When we
defeat them, for our victory to be meaningful it needs to be
permanent. And it can be so only when all the Muslims either become
non-Muslims or cease to exist. This tenet also is derived from the
Muslim mentality. Whenever the Muslims defeat any non-Muslims, they do
not extend niceties to the defeated party. The Muslim give their
victims three choices : - Embrace Islam, - Live a life of constant
humiliation and hardship under Muslim tyranny as 2nd class denizens
worse than animals, - Be hacked to death for refusing to embrace Islam
and refusing to accept 2nd class status where you are treated worse than animals. The same courtesy needs to be
extended to all defeated Muslim, if we are to consolidate the gains of our
victory over them. Our objective of saying all this is to make the surgery of the War on Terror effective once and forever against the cancer of theology-inspired terrorism. In our heart of hearts, even we do not like these desperate measures that we recommend here. But is there any other way that would be equally effective in saving humanity from theology inspired terrorism, of which the Islamic variety is the most lethal one? The answer to this question leaves our recommendations without any other option! Story Credits WaronJihad team
__________________________________________________
Discuss this
article
|