Site Motto

This is a non-commercial site brought to you with the aim of creating awareness about the challenge of terrorism. Daily News on the War on the Jihad.

Breaking News

Can one win a mortal combat of the War on Terror with one hand cuffed?

Fighting a mortal combat with one hand tied behind is the situation today with most of the nations that are afflicted with the challenge of Terrorism. Russia suffered Beslan, blown up airliners, hostage crises at the Moscow theatre; but it still helps Iran to build nuclear facilities and threatens to spike Western efforts to refer Iran to the Security Council for Sanctions. Russia want to continue having its honeymoon with Syria and also wants a relationship with the PA (Palestinian Authority) promising to supply it with weaponry and equipment that could be used against Israel. And where do the loyalties of the Iranian Mullahs, Syrian Baathists and the Palestinians lie? With the Russians or with the terrorists attacking Russia? The answer is obvious, except to the foggy vision of the Russian leaders!

While the terrorists are united in their murderous objective across the globe and call for "Death to all infidels", the response to this unitary challenge of terrorism is disjointed. And as long as this response is also not as unitary and as determined as the challenge of terrorism, there is no hope for an early or easy victory over the challenge of Islamic Terrorism.

Moral of the Story : Our hand that is manacled with the handcuffs of narrow nationalistic opportunism and mutual rivalry has to be released so that we can grapple manfully with Islamic Terrorism and save human civilization from this mortal challenge.

armyreco

_____________________

China has its own goose to roast with the Iranians. China has valid economic reasons to build bridges with Iran. China's energy deficit economy needs oil supplies badly and Iran has surplus of oil. And so China wants to support the Iranian Mullahs at the UN, despite the Uighur (Uygur) terrorists fighting to secede from China to form a separate Eastern Turkestan. Although China keep its happenings under warps helped by its state controlled media, some events of bomb blasts and police action against terrorists do seep out.

Despite these problems, China also follows a global policy to winking at the depredations of terrorists across the globe and tries to be an uninterested bystander in the war on terror whenever it is not actively though unintentionally helping out the cause of terrorism by defending Iran at the UN.

India is another case of a rising economy that is energy starved and wants to build bridges (pipelines) to let the oil flow from Yadavaran Refinery in Iran to India. That this pipeline would be blown up by the Al Qaeda terrorists and Balouch fighters in Pakistan, escapes India's attention. India has recently voted in favor of the IAEA resolution on Iran, but India's commitment remains wavering at best. India faces a bloodied terrorist insurgency in its northernmost province of Kashmir, but when it comes to Iran who is a supporter of Islamist terror, India is ambivalent! Why so? Why is it that even Western nations who are subject to the most dramatic terror attacks take an ambivalent approach when confronting terrorism, especially when its rivals are facing the same challenge?

Why does the US administration, at least till recently raise the bogey of human rights violations in Chechnya to pin down rival Russia, and also make strange noises when Uzbekistan puts down Islamist insurgency with a strong hand? Who could be an ally of the USA, the non-Islamist government of Karimov or the Islamists who want to replace his government with an Islamist Caliphate? The US administration has behaved in a ham headed manner on this issue as on many others too.

The US wants Israel to follow the roadmap toward a two state solution where a Jewish and a Muslim state co-exist peacefully in the Middle East - as if Muslim have ever existed peacefully with anyone! The EU also puts similar pressure on Israel to bend backwards on the Palestinian issue. And with whom do the loyalties of the Palestinians lie with the US and EU or the terrorists who bedevil them? The answer was oud and clear on 9/11 when Palestinians went about hooting in joy and distributing candy. But the US is blind to this reality and keeps pushing the hapless Sharon to extend concessions to the Palestinian terrorists.

France too follows a tough anti-terrorism policy at home, but its foreign policy is based on supporting dictators like Saddam to the hilt. This travesty owes itself partly to Frances business entanglements with the erstwhile Saddam regime and partly to it hoary Anglophobia. But such a travesty in France's policy strengthens the hands of Dictators like Saddam and helps forces supporting global terrorism.

The Brits who suffered on 7/7, followed a holier than thou policy while granting asylum to terrorists from across the globe, and turned a Nelson's eye on their depredations in the UK calling for murder of the infidels (Brits among them). In an ironical way, 7/7 has been the saving grace (no pun intended on the term saving). The Brits have now opened their a wee bit, to deport the most rabid among the terrorists, but reports say that there are thousands of Muslims who belong to sleeper cells and are waiting for a green signal to blow themselves up and take as many as they can with them.

An objective observer would be foxed as to why the administrations from as varied countries as China, UK, Russia, India, USA all follow double standards when they face terrorism. In Chechnya there is for the USA a question of human rights violation, when the US itself is subject to the worst form of terror attacks. For Russia Iran needs to be given the right to nuclear technology, while Russian school kids are murdered by Islamists. China would veto the resolution imposing sanctions on Iran, while the Han Chinese are murdered in Xinjiang. Why so? India would grumble about non-alignment and be very reluctant to oppose Iran's nuclear ambitions when Indians are being murdered in Kashmir and in the recurrent terrorists attacks in India. Why? The Brits are magnanimous to extend the tenets of the Magna Carta to those who consider murdering Brits to be their right and aholy duty! Why?

The answer is that all the leading governments of the globe have a narrow view of the global problem of terrorism. When it pinches them, they scream "Ouch", but when it pinches others, they call for restraint or dignify terrorism by asking for the elimination of the causes of terrorism, call for restraint and respect for the human rights of the terrorists!

And what do the terrorists say: They call for death to all infidels. The terrorists are paranoid and united in their murderous objective across the globe. It is only the response to this unitary challenge of terrorism that is disjointed. And as long as this response is also not as unitary and as determined as the challenge f terrorism, there is no hope for an early or easy victory over the challenge of Islamic Terrorism.

Moral of the Story : Our hand that is manacled with the handcuffs of narrow nationalistic opportunism and mutual rivalry has to be released so that we can grapple manfully with Islamic Terrorism and save human civilization from this mortal challenge.

Story Credits: War on Jihad

__________________________________________________

Discuss this article

Google
Search WWW Search waronjihad.org Search historyofjihad.org

______________________________________________________________________ ____________

________________________________________

Send your feedback to:

- The WaronJihad team

______________________________________________

______________________________________________

Letters to the Editor
Read Letters to the Editor

______________________________________________

Free Hit Counter
Thanks for visiting